Normal Forms for Defeasible Logic
نویسندگان
چکیده
Defeasible logic is an important logic-programming based nonmonotonic reasoning formalism which has an eecient implementation. It makes use of facts, strict rules, defeasible rules, defeaters, and a superiority relation. Representation results are important because they can help the assimilation of a concept by connning attention to its critical aspects. In this paper we derive some representation results for defeasible logic. In particular we show that the superiority relation does not add to the expressive power of the logic, and can be simulated by other ingredients in a modular way. Also, facts can be simulated by strict rules. Finally we show that we cannot simplify the logic any further in a modular way: Strict rules, defeasible rules, and defeaters form a minimal set of independent ingredients in the logic.
منابع مشابه
Relating Defeasible Logic to the Well-Founded Semantics for Normal Logic Programs
The most recent version of defeasible logic (Nute 1997) is related to the well-founded semantics by translating defeasible theories into normal logic programs. A correspondence is shown between the assertions of a defeasible theory and the literals contained in the well-founded model of the translation. The translation scheme is based upon (Antoniou & Maher 2002) but is modified to account for ...
متن کاملAmbiguity Propagating Defeasible Logic and the Well-Founded Semantics
The most recent version of defeasible logic (Nute, 1997) is related to the well-founded semantics by translating defeasible theories into normal logic programs using a simple scheme proposed in (Brewka, 2001). It is found that by introducing ambiguity propagation into this logic, the assertions of defeasible theories coincide with the well-founded models of their logic program translations. Wit...
متن کاملAnnotated defeasible logic
Defeasible logics provide several linguistic features to support the expression of defeasible knowledge. There is also a wide variety of such logics, expressing different intuitions about defeasible reasoning. However, the logics can only combine in trivial ways. This limits their usefulness in contexts where different intuitions are at play in different aspects of a problem. In particular, in ...
متن کاملOn Influence and Contractions in Defeasible Logic Programming
In this paper, we investigate the problem of contraction in Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP), a logic-based approach for defeasible argumentation. We develop different notions of contraction based on both, the different forms of entailment implicitly existent in argumentation-based formalisms and the influence literals exhibit in the reasoning process. We give translations of widely accepted...
متن کاملDefeasible Inference with Circumscribed OWL Ontologies
The Web Ontology Language (OWL) adheres to the openworld assumption and can thus not be used for forms of nonmonotonic reasoning or defeasible inference, an acknowledged desirable feature in open Semantic Web environments. We investigate the use of the formalism of circumscriptive description logics (DLs) to realise defeasible inference within the OWL framework. By example, we demonstrate how r...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1998